|
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 |
| Inside the Demise of Bear Stearns |
This Wall Street Journal article gives a day-by-day breakdown of what happened over the weekend with Bear Sterns: The Week That Shook Wall Street: Inside the Demise of Bear Stearns The mood changed daily, as did the apparent scope of the problem. On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson thought markets would be calmed by the announcement that the Federal Reserve had agreed to help bail out Bear Stearns. President Bush gave a reassuring speech that day about the fundamental soundness of the U.S. economy. By Saturday, however, Mr. Paulson had become convinced that a definitive agreement to sell Bear Stearns had to be inked before markets opened yesterday.
Bear Stearns's board of directors was whipsawed by the rapidly unfolding events, in particular by the pressure from Washington to clinch a deal, says one person familiar with their deliberations.
"We thought they gave us 28 days," this person says, in reference to the terms of the Fed's bailout financing. "Then they gave us 24 hours."
In the end, Washington more or less threw its rule book out the window. The Fed, which has been at the forefront of the government response, made a number of unprecedented moves. Among other things, it agreed to temporarily remove from circulation a big chunk of difficult-to-trade securities and to offer direct loans to Wall Street investment banks for the first time.
The terms of the Bear Stearns sale contained some highly unusual features. For one, J.P. Morgan retains the option to purchase Bear's valuable headquarters building in midtown Manhattan, even if Bear's board recommends a rival offer. Also, the Fed has taken responsibility for $30 billion in hard-to-trade securities on Bear Stearns's books, with potential for both profit and loss.
The question now looming over the transaction: Has the government set a precedent for propping up failing financial institutions at a time when its more traditional tools don't appear to be working? Cutting interest rates -- which the Fed is expected to do again today, by between a half percentage point and a full point -- hasn't yet done much to loosen capital markets gummed up by piles of bad debt.
Even though the transaction ultimately could leave taxpayers on the hook for losses, the political response so far has been fairly positive. "When you're looking into the abyss, you don't quibble over details," said New York Democratic Senator Charles Schumer. Great, the economy is now being referred to as an "abyss". I am so not looking forward to the next couple of quarters.Labels: Recession Obsession |
| posted by Boston Gal @ 12:01 AM *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
Links to this post:
|
| 4 Comments: |
-
I would love to hear whether anyone is glad that there wasn't any regulation on the mortgage lending industry when it was apparent that there was a problem. One of the fed governors said he warned Greenspan back in 2000 that there was a problem brewing the mortgage markets. Greenspan did nothing.
Now we have this mess with no end in sight. It's just unbelievably frustrating.
-
I personally do NOT think the Fed should have bailed out Bear Stearns. It appears that there has been too much of throwing the "rule book out the window" these days.... and these firms MUST bear (pardon the pun)the responsibility of thier poor business practices. I put some of the subprime mess blame on them. If they fold, let them fold. Remember, this is a free market economy. It WILL eventually get better. Um. Eventually. Right?
-
While I tend to agree with e. e. about letting Bears Stearns fail, I know there's a fine line to walk. Herbert Hoover apparently had a laissez faire philosophy and we all know where things ended up with that.
-
I also don't think we should be bailing out bsc but this whole mess shows just how powerful corporations are. When people are struggling to communicate to their senators how difficult it is to pay for healthcare, wall street gets unprecedented help just over one weekend in a 24 hour period.
|
| |
| << Home |
| |
|
|
|
|
I would love to hear whether anyone is glad that there wasn't any regulation on the mortgage lending industry when it was apparent that there was a problem. One of the fed governors said he warned Greenspan back in 2000 that there was a problem brewing the mortgage markets. Greenspan did nothing.
Now we have this mess with no end in sight. It's just unbelievably frustrating.